Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 6252PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Love County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by L. O. Smith against R. T. Bond. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was instituted by L. O. Smith to recover from Rufus T. Bond upon a certain promissory note of $1,210 and interest, which note was given for an interest in a mercantile business owned by L. O. Smith in Love county, Okla. After the purchase of this interest, a partnership was formed of Walker, Bond & Co., which was composed of R. H. Walker, Rufus T. Bond, and L. O. Smith. In the note sued on, the payee retained the title, ownership, and possession of the interest of Rufus T. Bond in and to said mercantile business as security for the note. The defendant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. O. K. Transfer & Storage Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Stebbins v. Lena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Rawlings v. UferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Leveridge v. NotarasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API