Legal Opinion

Silvernale v. Logan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Defendants have appealed from an equity decree which adjudged a ditch and water pipeline to be easements by implication appurtenant to land, enjoined interference therewith, and awarded $500 damages to plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs’ and defendants’ adjoining tracts were part of a larger acreage patented to the Wilbers. The Wilbers, before disposing of any of this homestead, developed and obtained a right for water arising in a spring off the land, and brought it to the land through a main ditch, sometimes called “the creek.” The evidence is conflicting but it appears that some of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hall v. Risley and HeikkilaOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Jack v. HUNT ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Fitzstephens v. WATSONOregon Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Corey v. United Savings Bank, MutualCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Corey v. United Savings Bank, MutualCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Ross v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API