Silvernale v. Logan
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
(Pro Tempore).
Defendants have appealed from an equity decree which adjudged a ditch and water pipeline to be easements by implication appurtenant to land, enjoined interference therewith, and awarded $500 damages to plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs’ and defendants’ adjoining tracts were part of a larger acreage patented to the Wilbers. The Wilbers, before disposing of any of this homestead, developed and obtained a right for water arising in a spring off the land, and brought it to the land through a main ditch, sometimes called “the creek.” The evidence is conflicting but it appears that some of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hall v. Risley and HeikkilaOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Jack v. HUNT ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Fitzstephens v. WATSONOregon Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Corey v. United Savings Bank, MutualCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Corey v. United Savings Bank, MutualCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Ross v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982