Corey v. United Savings Bank, Mutual
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*265BUTTLER, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a trial court decree declaring that they have no right to an easement of access between their property and that of defendant and denying plaintiffs an injunction. Plaintiffs contend on appeal that the evidence was sufficient to establish plaintiffs’ right to an express easement over the property in question, or that plaintiffs are entitled to an irrevocable license in the nature of an easement because of substantial expenditures they claim to have made in reliance on defendant’s predecessor’s promise to permit common access. We affirm.
Plaintiffs purchased…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. Risley and HeikkilaOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Nelson v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. EoffOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Silvernale v. LoganOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Williams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Pfaendler v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Vandehey Development Co. v. SuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Rehwald v. FranzeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.