Legal Opinion
Greenhalgh v. Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 29, 2014No. 44222-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.
¶1 Shawn Greenhalgh and James Pfaff appeal the superior court’s summary dismissal of their claims against the Department of Corrections (DOC). Greenhalgh and Pfaff argue that (1) RCW 72.02.045(3) and WAC 137-36-060 require DOC to store their previously authorized property until their release; (2) DOC’s revised policy 440.000 (DOC 440.000) constitutes impermissible and unconstitutional forfeiture under RCW 9.92.110 and Wash. Const, art. I, § 15; and (3) DOC violated state and federal due process when it deprived them of their previously authorized property.
f 2 We hold that the superior court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richard A. Fox And Marnie B. Fox, Apps. v. Skagit County, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. ManloveCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Arendt Speser v. Kelsey And John Doe MondauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Barney M. Yorkston, Jr. & Carollyn D. Yorkston, Apps./x-resps. v. Whatcom County, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Thomas Allen ChristianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.