Richard A. Fox And Marnie B. Fox, Apps. v. Skagit County, Res.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.
¶1 Richard and Marnie Fox appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel Skagit County to issue a building permit. The Foxes argue the trial court erred when it ruled that the well on their property, despite being exempt from the water permit requirement, is not an adequate water supply for purposes of the building permit statute because the well is subject to senior water rights—namely, the 2001 instream flow rule for the Skagit River. We conclude that a permit-exempt well under RCW 90.44.050 is subject to the prior appropriation doctrine and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- WILSON, P.E. VS. PAHRUMP FAIR WATER, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Magdalena T. Bassett v. Washington State Department Of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Center For Environmental Law & Policy v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Fox v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.