Legal Opinion

State v. Manlove

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 17, 2015No. 32232-7-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Fearing, J.

RCW 9.94A.535(3)(a) allows a sentencing enhancement if a jury finds an aggravating factor that “[t]he defendant’s conduct during the commission of the current offense manifested deliberate cruelty to the victim.” David Manlove argues that this enhancement may not apply to a property crime and, in particular, to burglary. We disagree and affirm his sentence.

FACTS

¶2 In 2005, Paula Parker and her then-husband purchased a remote cabin on forty acres in Stevens County, Washington. The couple became acquainted with their neighbor, David Manlove, whose home lay a half mile from Parker’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. SweanyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. In re the Postsentence Review of ChildersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ManloveWashington Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API