Legal Opinion

Geary v. Stanley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 18, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Alice Geary appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, Mills, J.) granting defendant NAMI Research Institute, Inc.’s (NRI) motion to dismiss. Geary argues that the court erred in dismissing her complaint because she omitted NRI from her first complaint due to incorrect information provided to her, and the time to amend her first complaint had expired before she learned of the continued existence of NRI. NRI asserts that Geary’s appeal is frivolous. Although there may be a question as to whether the complaint in Geary’s original action might be amended to add…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick GoerdelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Curtis v. DiMaioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  3. Dolliver v. DolliverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of John R. Barron v. Shapiro & Morley, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Geary v. Stanley Medical Research InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. U.S. Bank National Association v. Thomas ManningSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  4. U.S. Bank National Association v. Thomas ManningSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. George E. Gooley v. Danielle L. FradetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API