Legal Opinion

Geary v. Stanley Medical Research Institute

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 15, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] In these separate but similar cases, the Stanley Medical Research Institute and Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, its executive director at the time these cases arose (collectively referred to as SMRI), appeal from decisions of the Superior Court (Waldo County and Cumberland County, Mills, J.) granting SMRI’s motions for summary judgment in part and denying them in part. Matthew Cyr and Lorie Stevens (collectively referred to as Cyr unless otherwise noted) in each case filed a combined motion for summary judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 56, and motion to dismiss pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Webb v. HaasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Nicoletta v. Rochester Eye & Human Parts Bank, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lever v. Acadia Hospital Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ann Salerno v. Spectrum Medical Group, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. State of Maine v. Billy L. BeaulieuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  3. Kennedy-McInnis v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016
  4. U.S. Bank National Association v. Thomas ManningSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. U.S. Bank National Association v. Thomas ManningSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API