Manns v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Presiding Judge.
George Manns (Manns) appeals a Kosciusko Superior Court jury conviction for theft.
We affirm.
ISSUE
The essence of Manns's three allegations of error may be stated as follows: Does the double jeopardy doctrine bar Manns's second trial for theft? 1
FACTS
Manns's first trial resulted in the following jury verdict; "We, the jury, find the defendant, George Manns, guilty of having in his possession stolen property." The trial court accepted this verdict and discharged the jury. After the jury separated, the court and the parties questioned the propriety of this form of verdict…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Crim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Moyer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Broadus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Maynard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ried v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ried v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.