Legal Opinion

Manns v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1984No. 4-383A81PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Presiding Judge.

George Manns (Manns) appeals a Kosciusko Superior Court jury conviction for theft.

We affirm.

ISSUE

The essence of Manns's three allegations of error may be stated as follows: Does the double jeopardy doctrine bar Manns's second trial for theft? 1

FACTS

Manns's first trial resulted in the following jury verdict; "We, the jury, find the defendant, George Manns, guilty of having in his possession stolen property." The trial court accepted this verdict and discharged the jury. After the jury separated, the court and the parties questioned the propriety of this form of verdict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Crim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Moyer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broadus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Maynard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ried v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Ried v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API