Legal Opinion

Broadus v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1986No. 784S304PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIVARNIK, Justice.

Defendants-Appellants Edward Broadus, Jr., and James H. Dunville were jointly tried by a jury in the Elkhart Circuit Court. Each was convicted of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon and sentenced to serve a term of twenty (20) years. Appellants now raise the following twelve (12) issues:

1. admission of testimony tainted by unduly suggestive identification procedures;

2. admission of evidence tainted by an illegal search;

3. exclusion of black jurors from the jury panel;

4. allowing a hearing impaired juror to serve on the jury;

5. denial of a motion for severance;

6. use of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Sekou v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Dobbins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Olson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wade v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API