Legal Opinion

Moyer v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1978No. 3-376A63PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrard, P.J.

After trial by jury Moyer was convicted of theft. His appeal asserts the prosecution was barred by the double jeopardy clause and that physical evidence and his inculpatory statements should have been excluded as the product of an illegal arrest. We affirm.

The factual background discloses that Mid-Town Barbers in Michigan City was burglarized on March 19,1975. Missing were various barber tools, a checkbook for the shop account and approximately $700 in cash, which included a large amount of change. Moyer, who was employed at the shop, had been seen inside after the shop was closed and shortly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Lopez v. KilligrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Harlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Watkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dolan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Rutledge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Munger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Cash v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API