Legal Opinion

Willmschen v. Meeker

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1988No. 87-83, 87-84PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Cross appeals are presented, derived from consecutive installment-contract land sales, with buyer suing the real estate broker for land title and encumbrance misrepresentation as a fraud action, and the broker counterclaiming for a resale commission on a part of the purchased property. Both litigants were unsuccessful in trial court, and we affirm, to their equal sufferance in denial.

We address the Willmschens’ appeal by affirming the trial court on disposition under stated Issue IV of their brief:

“WHETHER THE APPELLANTS WERE DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE FRAUDULENT…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Davenport v. EpperlyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Amfac Mechanical Supply Co. v. FedererWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Adel v. ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wayland v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Britton v. Bill Anselmi Pontiac-Buick-GMC, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Skane v. Star Valley Ranch Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cottonwood Valley Ranch, Inc. v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rick Holloway and John Hoskin v. Hidden Creek Outfitters, Llc and Park County Title Company, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API