Legal Opinion

Amfac Mechanical Supply Co. v. Federer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1982No. 5646PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

Amfac Mechanical Supply Company (appellant), in order to collect an unpaid account owed by C & B Plumbing and Heating, Inc. (C & B), in the amount of approximately $11,000, sued Carl and Beverly Federer (appellees) to pierce the corporate veil and reach the personal assets of appellees. At the end of the appellant’s case in a nonjury trial, the trial judge, after briefs had been submitted, granted appel-lees’ motion to dismiss. In his letter opinion the judge expressed his view that appellant had failed to prove a prima facie case because it did not “show that the corporation…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,309 Karen A. McVay v. Western Plains Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Consumer's Co-Op of Walworth County v. OlsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Zimmerman v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City, S.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API