(PC) Garone v. Mencias
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISAIAH GARONE, No. 2:22-cv-2310 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 GLADYS MENCIAS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil 18 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Gladys Mencias’s fully briefed motion to 19 dismiss is before the Court. As discussed below, the Court recommends that defendant’s motion 20 to dismiss be partially granted. 21 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS 22 In his first amended…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.