Legal Opinion

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1997No. 97-809PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

We approve the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the board. In each of these four instances, respondent received a retainer and then neglected the legal matter entrusted to him. In Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall (1984), 14 Ohio St.3d 15, 17, 14 OBR 320, 321, 470 N.E.2d 886, 888, we found that such a practice was “tantamount to theft of that fee from the client.”

When we have found repeated failures to carry out entrusted legal matters, we have imposed the sanction of an indefinite suspension from the practice of law. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Anderson (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SigallOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LeiboldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. RollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API