Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Snyder

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. 96-2428PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We approve the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the board. From a review of the record we can understand the factors which caused respondent to neglect his professional duty to his clients. Nevertheless, we have a constitutional duty to oversee the conduct of the legal profession in' Ohio, and we cannot condone respondent’s failures to meet his responsibilities. An attorney’s failure to carry out a legal matter entrusted to him and failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation have warranted suspension from the practice of law. Disciplinary Counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LeiboldOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Akron Bar Assn. v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. ShamanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BaasOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API