Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Blankenship
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Relator’s complaint was served upon respondent in October 1994, but respondent did not interpose a response until July 31, 1995, and then only at the last moment before us. As relator points out, “To allow the *590Respondent to ignore * * * these proceedings and now to blithely suggest — ten months * * * [later] — that the process begin again, would be to totally disregard the public and professional obligations of the disciplinary system.” Moreover, respondent has repeatedly failed to perform legal services for…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1999