Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Blankenship

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-1200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Relator’s complaint was served upon respondent in October 1994, but respondent did not interpose a response until July 31, 1995, and then only at the last moment before us. As relator points out, “To allow the *590Respondent to ignore * * * these proceedings and now to blithely suggest — ten months * * * [later] — that the process begin again, would be to totally disregard the public and professional obligations of the disciplinary system.” Moreover, respondent has repeatedly failed to perform legal services for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API