Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leibold
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Having thoroughly re-viewed the record, we find sufficient evidence from which to conclude that respondent violated each of the Disciplinary Rules cited in the complaint. Moreover, we agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, respondent is ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Akron Bar Assn. v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. PringleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.