McAllen v. Hodge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Pine county to recover from defendants, Fred A. Hodge and Carrie F. Hodge, $30,000 for alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s husband. Peter W. McAllen, the divorced husband, intervened, pleading the contract with plaintiff referred to in the opinion. From an order, Williston, J., striking out his complaint of intervention, intervenor appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
It appears from the complaint that, as a result of interference on the part of defendants with plaintiff’s domestic relations, she and her husband became separated, and finally divorced, and this action was brought by her to recover damages for the alienation of her husband’s affections.
Before the case, came on for trial, the divorced husband, Peter McAllen, served a complaint in intervention, which alleged that plaintiff and he were married in 1894, continuing husband and wife until December 28, 1901, when they were duly divorced by the judgment of *69the court; that, upon the date of entry of.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitman v. J. P. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
- Lewis v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Becker v. NorthwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Bennett v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Wohlwend v. J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Walker v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Kniefel v. KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Avery v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- McAllen v. McAllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.