Lewis v. Harwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was brought in the district court for Olmsted county, and was tried by Mitchell, J., on the issues made between the intervenors and the plaintiff, and judgment was ordered for the intervenors. A motion for a new trial was denied by Buckham, J., and the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.*
This case brings before us for interpretation the section of statute relating to intervention, introduced into our Code of .Practice from the Code of Civil Practice of Louisiana, which, as is. .well known, has its basis in the civil law. The section reads as follows : “Any person who has an interest in the matter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties to the action, or against either *430or both, may become a party to any action or proceeding between other persons, either by joining the plaintiff in claiming what is sought by the complaint, or by uniting with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Gasquet v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830
- Bennett v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Heyneman v. DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- County of Yuba v. Adams & Co.California Supreme Court · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Moreland v. Monarch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
- Salchert v. ReinigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- McClellan v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Becker v. NorthwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.