Legal Opinion

Wohlwend v. J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of tbe district court for Wilkin county, G. L. Brown, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the complaint in intervention.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This action was brought against the defendant railway company to recover the value of a traction engine belonging to plaintiffs, (appellants,) and alleged to have been wholly destroyed through the defendant’s negligence. Thereupon the respondent corporation, as a mortgagee of the destroyed property, intervened by filing its complaint in the manner provided in Gen. St. 1878, c. 66, § 131, setting up the execution and delivery to it, by plaintiffs and another person, of three promissory notes, each for a specified sum of money; the execution and delivery of a chattel mortgage upon the traction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Bennett v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. Barry v. McGradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  4. Des Moines Insurance Co. v. LentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Jacobson v. LandoltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  2. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Dennis v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. In Re Application of Sister Kenny Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. McAllen v. HodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API