Legal Opinion
Musk v. Nelson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 29, 1994PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Gail G. Musk appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Perkins, A.R.J.) granting Nancy Nelson’s *1200motion to dismiss her claim based upon a faded sterilization as barred by the statute of limitations. Musk, inter alia, contends (1) that section 2931 of title 24 of the Maine Revised Statutes Annotated creates a cause of action for a failed sterilization, 24 M.R.S.A. § 2931 (1990) (Wrongful life/wrongful birth); that is distinct from other actions for professional negligence, 24 M.R.S.A. § 2902 (statute of limitations for professional negligence); (2)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- McAfee v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Choroszy v. TsoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Nevin v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Saunders v. TisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Rockland Plaza Realty Corp. v. City of RocklandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Butler v. KilloranSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.