Legal Opinion
Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 28, 2003No. 01-CV-1681PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Joseph Henry and Michael Malinky (collectively “plaintiff’), 1 who are participants in defendant CommutAir’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), brought suit against defendants (Champlain Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Com-mutAir, Antony Von Elbe, John Arthur Sullivan, Jr., Ernest James Drollette, Andrew Price, William L. Owens, Champlain Air, Inc., and U.S. Trust Company of California, N.A.), alleging three causes of action: Count One — claiming breaches of fiduciary duties in violation of the Employee Retirement…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Kilburn v. Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Rondout Valley Central School District v. Coneco Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.