Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Finlayson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

The findings of fact, with respect to the domicile of H. L. Einlayson, at the date of his death, made by the clerk, and approved by the judge of the Superior Court of Wayne County, on petitioners’ appeal from the order of the clerk, were supported by competent evidence, and are therefore conclusive. Although there was conflict in the evidence, the findings of fact are not subject to review by this Court. Lumber Co. v. Finance Co., 204 N. C., 285, 168 S. E., 219; Tyer v. Lumber Co., 188 N. C., 268, 124 S. E., 305; In re Martin, 185 N. C., 472, 111 S. E., 561.

In the last cited case, it is said:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. B. Blades Lumber Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. In Re the Administration of the Estate of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Tyer v. J. B. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Mpiliris v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  3. Katherine Inez Hall v. Wake County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General Ex Rel. Owens v. ChaplinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. In Re Guardianship of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API