State Ex Rel. Attorney-General Ex Rel. Owens v. Chaplin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErviN, J.
The official certificate of election constituted prima facie evidence that the defendant was entitled to the office of Clerk of the Superior Court of Tyrrell County, and imposed- on the relator the burden of establishing the grounds of his complaint. Jones v. Flynt, 159 N. C., 87, 74 S. E., 817; Rodwell v. Rowland, 137 N. C., 617, 50 S. E., 319; Boyer v. Teague, 106 N. C., 576, 11 S. E., 665, 19 Am. S. R., 547; Roberts v. Calvert, 98 N. C., 580, 4 S. E., 127. The referee and the judge have found that the relator has successfully met this burden. Their findings of fact are binding upon us if…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Van Bokkelen v. . CanadaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Gardner v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Katherine Inez Hall v. Wake County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.