Legal Opinion

Katherine Inez Hall v. Wake County Board of Elections

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1972No. 37PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant took no exception to any finding of fact made by Judge Brewer. The only assignment of error is to the entry of judgment that “plaintiff is a resident of Wake County and is, therefore, entitled to register and vote.” Thus, the facts found are binding upon this Court, and the only question presented is whether error of law appears on the face of the record. Manufacturing Co. v. Clayton, Acting Comr. of Revenue, 265 N.C. 165, 143 S.E. 2d 113 (1965); 1 N. C. Index 2d Appeal and Error § 26 (1967). Specifically, the question here is whether the facts found will support the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Wheeler v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. Hannon v. GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. AbshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Lloyd v. BabbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. CrockettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API