Legal Opinion

Odom v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1992No. 19095PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

In 1986, the appellant, William Odom, pled guilty to two counts of voluntary manslaughter, one count of grand theft, and to a charge of conspiracy to commit robbery. In 1989, he filed an application for post-conviction relief (which was later amended), asserting that his pleas of guilty were not voluntary and that there was a lack of evidence to show he had committed any homicide or entered into a conspiracy to commit robbery. Following an evidentiary hearing on the allegations in Odom’s application, the district court denied relief. We affirm.

Odom did not directly appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Huck v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Sanchez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Fodge v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Sosa v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API