Legal Opinion
Lamb Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Wonderland Ventures, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. The Toledo Blade Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1972No. 71-1662PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of a private anti-trust action brought by the Lamb companies (Lamb) in the District Court against The Toledo Blade Company (Blade), Cox Broadcasting Corporation (Cox), Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. (Buckeye), and Ohio Bell Telephone Company (Bell), to recover $54,319,900 damages, the complaint alleging that Lamb was excluded from the community antenna television (CATV) business in Toledo, Ohio, as a proximate result of a conspiracy entered into by said defendants to violate Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act 1 and Section 7 of the Clayton Act 2 . The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Andrew Byars v. Bluff City News Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. College Hills Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Shumate & Company, Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Shumate & Company, Inc. v. American Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.