Legal Opinion
De Luca v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1955No. Civ. 20867; Civ. 20868PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ASHBURN, J., pro tern. *
These cases involve the same facts and identical law points, with one exception which needs no comment. Each is an appeal from an order denying petition for writ of review. Counsel for the respondent board of supervisors stood upon a memorandum of law filed in opposition to the application and the ruling must be tested by the allegations of the petition. That of De Luca will be reviewed; the Bartholomae Corporation petition contains the same allegations.
Petitioner says he is the owner of certain real property upon which he has a residence; it is located within zones…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Aetna Insurance v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Beverly Oil Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Black v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Carlton v. QuintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.