Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Metropolitan Utilities Dist.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2014No. S-13-212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets BRUNO v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DIST. 551 Cite as

287 Neb. 551

In this case, Welsh never filed a petition in intervention. Although Welsh claims to have filed the equivalent in a writ­ ten motion, no such motion appears in the record before this court. At the time of his oral motion, Welsh was not a party to the suit. Furthermore, Welsh stated at the hearing that he no longer represented Wisniewski. Lacking subject matter juris­ diction, the court erred in deciding Welsh’s oral motion for payment. We have stated that a ruling made in the absence of subject matter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hunt v. TrackwellNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Anderson v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Robertson v. Jacobs Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Billups Ex Rel. Billups v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brothers v. Kimball Cty. Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. SID No. 1 v. AdamyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Nadeem v. StateNebraska Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Manon v. OrrNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. O'Brien v. O'BrienNebraska Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API