Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hixon
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1887No. 10,787PublishedCited by 51 opinions
From, the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
Errors are assigned hei’e in this cause by appellant, the defendant below, which call in question the overruling of (1) its demurrers to each of the paragraphs of appellee’s complaint, (2) its motion for a venire de novo, (3) its motion for a new trial, and (4) its motion in arrest of judgment.
The cause is now here for the second time. On the former appeal herein, the opinion and decision "of this court are reported under the title of Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co. v. Hixon, 79 Ind. 111. It was there said: “ Following the case of The Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co. v. Culver, 60 Ind. 469, the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Lillie v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.