Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kurtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 2004, which ruled that claimant was *771disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a laborer for the Department of Environmental Protection of the City of New York. As a result of his failure to call in or report to work on August 14, 2003, he was terminated from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that his employment was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GlowinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of MahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of SerafinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API