Legal Opinion

Washko v. Stewart

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1937No. Civ. 11284PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrail, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision. The automobile had been sent by the owner to the defendant Howard Automobile Company for servicing. At the time of the collision the car had been serviced and was being driven back to the owner by the defendant Stewart. The trial court rendered judgment against the driver of the ear and against the owner of the car, but denied judgment against the Howard Company under a finding that the driver of the car was not at the time of the accident acting as an employee of the Howard Company but was an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Buckley v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Schaller v. Industtrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Varisco v. Gateway Science & Engineering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Malvich v. RockwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API