Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Carroll

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1932No. Docket No. 8230PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action to establish a partnership in certain real estate transactions, and to secure an accounting. The court found the parties to be partners, and gave judgment against defendant in the sum of $10,-471.62, with interest. The appeal is taken from the judgment and two questions are presented—the insufficiency of the evidence and the allowance of interest upon the judgment from the date the complaint was filed.

The evidence shows that the first partnership contemplated by these parties was of a matrimonial character. The chief obstacle to its consummation was the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thom v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mashon v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Freese v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Elliot v. ElliotIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Biers v. SammonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Luchs v. OrmsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API