Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. James R. Hochschild

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2006No. 05-3159PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to determine which of two U.S. Sentencing Guidelines applies to the offense of crossing a state line with the purpose of having sex with a minor, when both guidelines refer to attempting to have sex with a minor, but neither guideline refers to the particular crime of traveling in interstate commerce with the purpose of having sex with a minor. 1 Only one of the two guidelines applies when the defendant attempted to have sex with a minor under 12 years of age (U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1). The other guideline can only apply to an attempt where the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. James Ronald HazelwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Samuel Demont BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Martece PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. GuestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. AngwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Daniel StanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. DarwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API