Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Stanford
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 19, 2018No. 17-30285PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:
This criminal appeal returns to this court after Stanford was resentenced following this court's decision in United States v. Stanford remanding the case "for any other proceedings as needed." Back before this court on appeal, Stanford, in addition to alleging various errors in the district court's redetermination of his guideline range, argues that the district court erred in denying his request for in camera review of various co-conspirator witness reports and requests that this court reassign the case to a different district court judge. Because the district…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Alexis Aguilar-AlonzoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Ams-Osram USA Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Alexis Aguilar-AlonzoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. AnguianoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.