Legal Opinion
Dorsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 27, 2003No. CIV. PJM 01-1449PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
Saunders Dorsey and LaJuan Martin have sued The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”) for intentional interference with contract. 1 Home Depot has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment which Dorsey and Martin oppose. Dorsey and Martin have filed a Counterclaim for Summary Judgment which Home Depot has moved to strike and which, in any event, it opposes. The Court will DENY Home Depot’s Motion to Strike and Plaintiffs’ Counterclaim for Summary Judgment. The Court will GRANT Home Depot’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Martin and DENY it WITHOUT…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- San Francisco Unified School District ex rel. Contreras v. First Student, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Northwest Bypass Group v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- Collective Shared Services, LLC v. CPDA Canvass Network, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Jackson v. American Electronic Warfare Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025