Legal Opinion
San Francisco Unified School District ex rel. Contreras v. First Student, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 2013No. A134405PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
In this action brought under the False Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.),1 the qui tarn plaintiffs allege that defendant Laidlaw Transit, Inc. (Laidlaw), and its successor in interest, First Student, Inc. (FSI), failed to maintain and repair the company’s buses as required by the company’s contract with San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD). At issue here is an injunction issued by the trial court barring the individual plaintiffs, former employees of Laidlaw, from discussing the lawsuit with any current employees of FSI.
The individual plaintiffs challenge…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. George T.California Supreme Court · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases Antelope Valley-east Kern Water Agency v. L. A. Cnty. Waterworks Dist. No. 40, Cross, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Jane Doe v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Dimagiba v. L1 Technologies, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Doe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.