Strauss v. Canty
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to a tract of land in Kings County. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff claims as successor in interest of Arney L. Weddle, to whom the land was granted by a United States patent on March 7, 1892. The defendant claims under a tax-deed, and also relies upon a title by prescription and the statute of limitations.
The plaintiff showed a good deraignment of title from Weddle. The record contains reference to a deed from Lucinda E. Weddle (wife of Arney L.) to Arna L. Weddle. The deed was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Blood v. LightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hihn v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Nathan v. DierssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adams v. LamicqUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Ginaca v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Cory v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Lathrop v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- First National Bank v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.