Blood v. Light
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Second District, Plumas County. The variance between the execution recited in the officer’s deed and. that offered in evidence, referred to in the opinion, consisted in this : that the latter directed the officer to make the amount of the judgment “ out of the real property of A. & E. Lightwhile hy the former he is commanded to make the judgment out of the real property of the same parties belonging to them “on the 23d day of August,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Second District, Plumas County. The variance between the execution recited in the officer’s deed and. that offered in evidence, referred to in the opinion, consisted in this : that the latter directed the officer to make the amount of the judgment “ out of the real property of A. & E. Lightwhile hy the former he is commanded to make the judgment out of the real property of the same parties belonging to them “on the 23d day of August, 1867.” The other facts in the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sanderson,. J., delivered the opinion of the Court:
This is an action of ejectment, founded in part upon a constable’s sale and deed. The judgment in the Court below passed for the plaintiff, and the defendant has brought the case here.
At the trial, a judgment rendered on the 27th of August, 1867, in the Court of A. F. Blood, a Justice of the Peace of Plumas County, in favor of Hugh Mullen and against A. and E. Light (the latter .being the defendant .in this action), doing business as Light & Brothers, for. $293 10, and costs, taxed at $31 50, was offered in evidence by the plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. AmoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Smith v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Hihn v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Jackson ex dem. Martin v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Hayden v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.