Legal Opinion

Shuey v. Frierson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This cause has heretofore been before this Court and is reported in 193 Tenn. 318, 246 S. W. (2d) 28. The case when it was before us at a former time, as above stated, was merely before us on the petition of the lessee Ayers, for certiorari. There was no petition of the Friersons, lessors, who are now petitioning, and as far as we know, since the petition for certiorari was merely on behalf of Ayers, there was nothing that we could do to bring the lessors before this court. For the reasons stated in the opinion in Skuey v. Frierson, supra, the Court of Appeals was reversed as to Ayers. This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. D. B. Loveman Co. v. BaylessTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cantrell v. Burnett & Henderson Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Knoxville v. HargisTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Shuey v. FriersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. City of Chattanooga v. BallewCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  4. Booth v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  5. Cart v. Coal Creek Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API