Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Burnett & Henderson Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1948PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliNsoN

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

In a memo opinion filed October 16, 1948, certiorari in tbis case was denied. Cantrell, tbe petitioner for certior-ari, bas filed tbe petition to rebear. Tbe burden of bis complaint is that tbe result of our conclusion in denying tbe certiorari is to deprive bim of bis constitutional right to a jury trial.

It is apparent from tbe face of tbe petition and tbe authorities to which it refers that counsel is laboring under tbe erroneous impression that our conclusion as to respondent, Hudson Sales Corporation, was dictated by Code, section 10654. Probably in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. D. B. Loveman Co. v. BaylessTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ragan v. KennedyTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1805

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. B. R. DeWitt, Inc. v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Haney v. Copeland (In Re Copeland)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  5. Booth v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API