Legal Opinion

United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. Capewell Mfg. Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 5, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5800PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the Assistant Commissioner, 83 USPQ 471, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences which had sustained appellant’s petition to cancel the registration of appellee’s mark as applied to nails.

Appellee’s mark is described by the examiner as “composed of a black disc surrounded by a circular line spaced from the disc a distance approximately twice the thickness of the circular line, and from which two groups of horizontal lines extend tangentially in opposite directions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Cyanamid Co. v. Synthetic Nitrogen Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  2. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Auburn Rubber Corp. v. Hanover Rubber Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. Sutter Packing Co. v. Piggly Wiggly Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Application of Lawrence A. HeinleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Martin N. Ornitz and Ray H. EnglishCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (u.s.a.) Inc. v. Mezger Pharmacal Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. In re RussellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API