Legal Opinion

Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (u.s.a.) Inc. v. Mezger Pharmacal Co., Inc

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 8, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Examiner-in-Chief of the United States Patent Office, 100 U.S.P.Q. 322, acting for the Commissioner of Patents, affirming the action of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing an opposition by appellant to appellee’s application for registration of the word “Lipofax” as a trade-mark for “a medicinal preparation in tablet form, namely, a vitamin product indicated for use in the management of atherosclerosis and for hypotonia.” The opposition was based on seven prior registrations owned by appellant, each involving a word…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. Capewell Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Servo Corporation of America v. Servo-Tek Products Co., Inc. (Electro-Devices, Inc., Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. Motorola, Inc. v. Griffiths Electronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. The Creamette Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Joseph Merlino, a Sole Trader Doing Business as Major Italian Foods CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API