Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2007No. Civil Action 07-0023 (RMU)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The pro se plaintiff brings suit, alleging that the Department of the Treasury wrongfully disbarred him from representing clients before the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). He asks the court to enjoin the defendants from enforcing his disbarment until the court can review the agency’s action on the merits. The plaintiff also seeks to prevent the defendants from advertising in public notices that he is disbarred. The defendants oppose the motion, arguing that the Department of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Feinerman v. BernardiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- American Meat Institute v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Majhor v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Sibley v. AlexanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hubbard v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.