Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 28, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0023 (RMU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The pro se plaintiff brings suit against the United States and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for allegedly wrongfully disbarring him from representing clients before the IRS. The court previously denied the plaintiffs request to enjoin the defendants from disbarring him pending the court’s review of the agency’s action on the merits. Prior to that ruling, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. In Re CalomirisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Tollefson v. Aurora Financial Group IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API