Legal Opinion

Woodbridge v. City of Duluth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1913No. Nos. 18,065—(276)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to restrain the city and its officers from issuing certain municipal bonds, from proceeding to let a contract for a certain sewer and from purchasing a certain automobile. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order sustaining a general demurrer to his complaint, in an action brought by him as a taxpayer of Duluth, for an injunction restraining the city officers from (1) issuing $100,000 of water and light bonds; (2) from extending a certain sewer; and (3) from purchasing an automobile for the fire department.

On December 3, 1912, the city of Duluth, which theretofore had been operating under a home rule charter, with a mayor and a city council of 16 aldermen, having the usual powers, adopted a charter for a commission form of government, whereby its powers were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. WymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Van Cleve v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. County of Hennepin v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Andrews v. BeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Leighton v. AbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API