Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Andrews v. Beach

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1923No. 23,427PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Appeal from a judgment quashing an alternative writ of mandamus by which respondents were required to publish and submit at a special election certain amendments to the charter of the city of Mankato. The facts were set forth in the writ as follows:

Mankato has a home rule charter, adopted in the year 1910. In May, 1922, and within 6 months of the general election held in November following, the board of freeholders, appointed by virtue of section 1343, G. S. 1913, delivered the draft of the proposed amendments to respondents, the mayor and councilmen of the city. The amendments ■were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Hopkins v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Lowe v. BarlowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Woodbridge v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Bicking v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Minneapolis Term Limits Coalition v. KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Haumant v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API