Legal Opinion

Leighton v. Abell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1948No. Nos. 34,691, 34,692PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 31 N.W.2d 646. There are before us two appeals from the same judgment. The case below was tried before the court on a complaint seeking judgment declaring M.S.A. 410.23, 410.24, 410.25 unconstitutional insofar as those sections purport to authorize the submission and acceptance of a "new charter" or "revised" home rule charter in any other manner than as prescribed by Minn. Const. art. 4, § 36, which authorizes the adoption of home rule charters by cities and villages. It also sought a determination of whether a certain proposal by the Minneapolis Charter Commission constituted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Reeves v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Button v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowman v. City of MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API