E. v. Prentice MacHinery Co. And Prentice MacHinery Works, Inc. v. Associated Plywood Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant in this treble damage action brought under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. Prior to the nonjury trial, defendant admitted liability, but denied that plaintiffs had sustained any damage. The trial court adopted this view. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the controlling law of damages in antitrust suits was disregarded, and that the findings of fact, in substantial respects, are clearly erroneous.
Appellant E. Y. Prentice Machinery Co. (Prentice) is an Oregon partnership, organized in 1947, engaged in the business…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hobart Brothers Company v. Malcolm T. Gilliland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Ford Motor Company v. Webster's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- James A. Mulvey v. Samuel Goldwyn ProductionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- James Mead and Roger Mead, Dba Mead's Market v. Retail Clerks International Association, Local Union No. 839, Afl-Cio, James Mead and Roger Mead, Dba Mead's Market v. Retail Clerks International Association, Local Union No. 839, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.